Never Saddle for Reparameterized Steepest Descent as Mirror Flow

Tom Jacobs, Chao Zhou, Rebekka Burkholz
3/2/2026
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

How does the choice of optimization algorithm shape a model's ability to learn features? To address this question for steepest descent methods --including sign descent, which is closely related to Adam --we introduce steepest mirror flows as a unifying theoretical framework. This framework reveals how optimization geometry governs learning dynamics, implicit bias, and sparsity and it provides two explanations for why Adam and AdamW often outperform SGD in fine-tuning. Focusing on diagonal linear networks and deep diagonal linear reparameterizations (a simplified proxy for attention), we show that steeper descent facilitates both saddle-point escape and feature learning. In contrast, gradient descent requires unrealistically large learning rates to escape saddles, an uncommon regime in fine-tuning. Empirically, we confirm that saddle-point escape is a central challenge in fine-tuning. Furthermore, we demonstrate that decoupled weight decay, as in AdamW, stabilizes feature learning by enforcing novel balance equations. Together, these results highlight two mechanisms how steepest descent can aid modern optimization.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jacobs2026never,
  title  = {Never Saddle for Reparameterized Steepest Descent as Mirror Flow},
  author = {Tom Jacobs and Chao Zhou and Rebekka Burkholz},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.02064},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02064v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.02064.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.02064)

Discussion