Generalized Per-Agent Advantage Estimation for Multi-Agent Policy Optimization

Seongmin Kim, Giseung Park, Woojun Kim, Jiwon Jeon, Seungyul Han +1 more
3/3/2026
cs.MA

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning that enhances sample efficiency and coordination through accurate per-agent advantage estimation. The core of our approach is Generalized Per-Agent Advantage Estimator (GPAE), which employs a per-agent value iteration operator to compute precise per-agent advantages. This operator enables stable off-policy learning by indirectly estimating values via action probabilities, eliminating the need for direct Q-function estimation. To further refine estimation, we introduce a double-truncated importance sampling ratio scheme. This scheme improves credit assignment for off-policy trajectories by balancing sensitivity to the agent's own policy changes with robustness to non-stationarity from other agents. Experiments on benchmarks demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing approaches, excelling in coordination and sample efficiency for complex scenarios.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kim2026generalized,
  title  = {Generalized Per-Agent Advantage Estimation for Multi-Agent Policy Optimization},
  author = {Seongmin Kim and Giseung Park and Woojun Kim and Jiwon Jeon and Seungyul Han and Youngchul Sung},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.02654},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02654v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.02654.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.02654)

Discussion