Still Fresh? Evaluating Temporal Drift in Retrieval Benchmarks

Nathan Kuissi, Suraj Subrahmanyan, Nandan Thakur, Jimmy Lin
3/4/2026
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CL

Official code: fresh-stack/driftbench (3 stars, Apache-2.0, last commit 2026-03-04).

Abstract

Information retrieval (IR) benchmarks typically follow the Cranfield paradigm, relying on static and predefined corpora. However, temporal changes in technical corpora, such as API deprecations and code reorganizations, can render existing benchmarks stale. In our work, we investigate how temporal corpus drift affects FreshStack, a retrieval benchmark focused on technical domains. We examine two independent corpus snapshots of FreshStack from October 2024 and October 2025 to answer questions about LangChain. Our analysis shows that all but one query posed in 2024 remain fully supported by the 2025 corpus, as relevant documents "migrate" from LangChain to competitor repositories, such as LlamaIndex. Next, we compare the accuracy of retrieval models on both snapshots and observe only minor shifts in model rankings, with overall strong correlation of up to 0.978 Kendall $τ$ at Recall@50. These results suggest that retrieval benchmarks re-judged with evolving temporal corpora can remain reliable for retrieval evaluation. We publicly release all our artifacts at https://github.com/fresh-stack/driftbench.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Apache-2.0

A repository for evaluating temporal drift in retrieval benchmarks

30Mar 4, 20267 months agoApache-2.0

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kuissi2026still,
  title  = {Still Fresh? Evaluating Temporal Drift in Retrieval Benchmarks},
  author = {Nathan Kuissi and Suraj Subrahmanyan and Nandan Thakur and Jimmy Lin},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.04532},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04532v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.04532.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.04532)

Discussion