Dissociating Direct Access from Inference in AI Introspection

Harvey Lederman, Kyle Mahowald
3/5/2026
cs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Introspection is a foundational cognitive ability, but its mechanism is not well understood. Recent work has shown that AI models can introspect. We study their mechanism of introspection, first extensively replicating Lindsey et al. (2025)'s thought injection detection paradigm in large open-source models. We show that these models detect injected representations via two separable mechanisms: (i) probability-matching (inferring from perceived anomaly of the prompt) and (ii) direct access to internal states. The direct access mechanism is content-agnostic: models detect that an anomaly occurred but cannot reliably identify its semantic content. The two model classes we study confabulate injected concepts that are high-frequency and concrete (e.g., "apple'"); for them correct concept guesses typically require significantly more tokens. This content-agnostic introspective mechanism is consistent with leading theories in philosophy and psychology.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lederman2026dissociating,
  title  = {Dissociating Direct Access from Inference in AI Introspection},
  author = {Harvey Lederman and Kyle Mahowald},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.05414},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05414v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.05414.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.05414)

Discussion