Novel Semantic Prompting for Zero-Shot Action Recognition

Salman Iqbal, Waheed Rehman
3/9/2026
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Zero-shot action recognition relies on transferring knowledge from vision-language models to unseen actions using semantic descriptions. While recent methods focus on temporal modeling or architectural adaptations to handle video data, we argue that semantic prompting alone provides a strong and underexplored signal for zero-shot action understanding. We introduce SP-CLIP, a lightweight framework that augments frozen vision-language models with structured semantic prompts describing actions at multiple levels of abstraction, such as intent, motion, and object interaction. Without modifying the visual encoder or learning additional parameters, SP-CLIP aligns video representations with enriched textual semantics through prompt aggregation and consistency scoring. Experiments across standard benchmarks show that semantic prompting substantially improves zero-shot action recognition, particularly for fine-grained and compositional actions, while preserving the efficiency and generalization of pretrained models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{iqbal2026novel,
  title  = {Novel Semantic Prompting for Zero-Shot Action Recognition},
  author = {Salman Iqbal and Waheed Rehman},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.08289},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08289v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.08289.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.08289)

Discussion