Quantifying the Accuracy and Cost Impact of Design Decisions in Budget-Constrained Agentic LLM Search

Kyle McCleary, James Ghawaly
3/9/2026
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems combine iterative search, planning prompts, and retrieval backends, but deployed settings impose explicit budgets on tool calls and completion tokens. We present a controlled measurement study of how search depth, retrieval strategy, and completion budget affect accuracy and cost under fixed constraints. Using Budget-Constrained Agentic Search (BCAS), a model-agnostic evaluation harness that surfaces remaining budget and gates tool use, we run comparisons across six LLMs and three question-answering benchmarks. Across models and datasets, accuracy improves with additional searches up to a small cap, hybrid lexical and dense retrieval with lightweight re-ranking produces the largest average gains in our ablation grid, and larger completion budgets are most helpful on HotpotQA-style synthesis. These results provide practical guidance for configuring budgeted agentic retrieval pipelines and are accompanied by reproducible prompts and evaluation settings.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mccleary2026quantifying,
  title  = {Quantifying the Accuracy and Cost Impact of Design Decisions in Budget-Constrained Agentic LLM Search},
  author = {Kyle McCleary and James Ghawaly},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.08877},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08877v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.08877.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.08877)

Discussion