SciTaRC: Benchmarking QA on Scientific Tabular Data that Requires Language Reasoning and Complex Computation

Hexuan Wang, Yaxuan Ren, Srikar Bommireddypalli, Shuxian Chen, Adarsh Prabhudesai +3 more
3/9/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

We introduce SciTaRC, an expert-authored benchmark of questions about tabular data in scientific papers requiring both deep language reasoning and complex computation. We show that current state-of-the-art AI models fail on at least 23% of these questions, a gap that remains significant even for highly capable open-weight models like Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, which fails on 65.5% of the tasks. Our analysis reveals a universal "execution bottleneck": both code and language models struggle to faithfully execute plans, even when provided with correct strategies. Specifically, code-based methods prove brittle on raw scientific tables, while natural language reasoning primarily fails due to initial comprehension issues and calculation errors.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wang2026scitarc,
  title  = {SciTaRC: Benchmarking QA on Scientific Tabular Data that Requires Language Reasoning and Complex Computation},
  author = {Hexuan Wang and Yaxuan Ren and Srikar Bommireddypalli and Shuxian Chen and Adarsh Prabhudesai and Rongkun Zhou and Elina Baral and Philipp Koehn},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.08910},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08910v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.08910.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.08910)

Discussion