Arbiter: Detecting Interference in LLM Agent System Prompts

Tony Mason
3/9/2026
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CR

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

System prompts for LLM-based coding agents are software artifacts that govern agent behavior, yet lack the testing infrastructure applied to conventional software. We present Arbiter, a framework combining formal evaluation rules with multi-model LLM scouring to detect interference patterns in system prompts. Applied to three major coding agent system prompts: Claude Code (Anthropic), Codex CLI (OpenAI), and Gemini CLI (Google), we identify 152 findings across the undirected scouring phase and 21 hand-labeled interference patterns in directed analysis of one vendor. We show that prompt architecture (monolithic, flat, modular) strongly correlates with observed failure class but not with severity, and that multi-model evaluation discovers categorically different vulnerability classes than single-model analysis. One scourer finding was structural data loss in Gemini CLI's memory system was consistent with an issue filed and patched by Google, which addressed the symptom without addressing the schema-level root cause identified by the scourer. Total cost of cross-vendor analysis: \$0.27 USD.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mason2026arbiter,
  title  = {Arbiter: Detecting Interference in LLM Agent System Prompts},
  author = {Tony Mason},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.08993},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08993v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.08993.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.08993)

Discussion