Common Sense vs. Morality: The Curious Case of Narrative Focus Bias in LLMs

Saugata Purkayastha, Pranav Kushare, Pragya Paramita Pal, Sukannya Purkayastha
3/10/2026
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: saugatapurkayastha/Commonsense_vs_morality (0 stars, Apache-2.0, last commit 2026-02-28).

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across diverse real-world applications and user communities. As such, it is crucial that these models remain both morally grounded and knowledge-aware. In this work, we uncover a critical limitation of current LLMs -- their tendency to prioritize moral reasoning over commonsense understanding. To investigate this phenomenon, we introduce CoMoral, a novel benchmark dataset containing commonsense contradictions embedded within moral dilemmas. Through extensive evaluation of ten LLMs across different model sizes, we find that existing models consistently struggle to identify such contradictions without prior signal. Furthermore, we observe a pervasive narrative focus bias, wherein LLMs more readily detect commonsense contradictions when they are attributed to a secondary character rather than the primary (narrator) character. Our comprehensive analysis underscores the need for enhanced reasoning-aware training to improve the commonsense robustness of large language models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Apache-2.0

This is the official repository for the paper "Common Sense vs. Morality: The Curious Case of Narrative Focus Bias in LLMs" accepted at LREC 2026

00PythonFeb 27, 20267 months agoApache-2.0

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{purkayastha2026common,
  title  = {Common Sense vs. Morality: The Curious Case of Narrative Focus Bias in LLMs},
  author = {Saugata Purkayastha and Pranav Kushare and Pragya Paramita Pal and Sukannya Purkayastha},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.09434},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09434v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.09434.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.09434)

Discussion