Quantifying the Necessity of Chain of Thought through Opaque Serial Depth

Jonah Brown-Cohen, David Lindner, Rohin Shah
3/10/2026
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) tend to externalize their reasoning in their chain of thought, making the chain of thought a good target for monitoring. This is partially an inherent feature of the Transformer architecture: sufficiently long serial cognition must pass through the chain of thought (Korbak et al., 2025). We formalize this argument through the notion of opaque serial depth, given by the length of the longest computation that can be done without the use of interpretable intermediate steps like chain of thought. Given this formalization, we compute numeric upper bounds on the opaque serial depth of Gemma 3 models, as well as asymptotic results for additional architectures beyond standard LLMs. We also open-source an automated method that can calculate upper bounds on the opaque serial depth of arbitrary neural networks, and use it to demonstrate that Mixture-of-Experts models likely have lower depth than dense models. Overall, our results suggest that opaque serial depth is a useful tool for understanding the potential for models to do significant reasoning that is not externalized.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{browncohen2026quantifying,
  title  = {Quantifying the Necessity of Chain of Thought through Opaque Serial Depth},
  author = {Jonah Brown-Cohen and David Lindner and Rohin Shah},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.09786},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09786v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.09786.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.09786)

Discussion