Ergodicity in reinforcement learning

Dominik Baumann, Erfaun Noorani, Arsenii Mustafin, Xinyi Sheng, Bert Verbruggen +3 more
3/11/2026
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

In reinforcement learning, we typically aim to optimize the expected value of the sum of rewards an agent collects over a trajectory. However, if the process generating these rewards is non-ergodic, the expected value, i.e., the average over infinitely many trajectories with a given policy, is uninformative for the average over a single, but infinitely long trajectory. Thus, if we care about how the individual agent performs during deployment, the expected value is not a good optimization objective. In this paper, we discuss the impact of non-ergodic reward processes on reinforcement learning agents through an instructive example, relate the notion of ergodic reward processes to more widely used notions of ergodic Markov chains, and present existing solutions that optimize long-term performance of individual trajectories under non-ergodic reward dynamics.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{baumann2026ergodicity,
  title  = {Ergodicity in reinforcement learning},
  author = {Dominik Baumann and Erfaun Noorani and Arsenii Mustafin and Xinyi Sheng and Bert Verbruggen and Arne Vanhoyweghen and Vincent Ginis and Thomas B. Schön},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.10895},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10895v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.10895.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.10895)

Discussion