Chemical Reaction Networks Learn Better than Spiking Neural Networks

Sophie Jaffard, Ivo F. Sbalzarini
3/12/2026
cs.LGcs.AImath.ST

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We mathematically prove that chemical reaction networks without hidden layers can solve tasks for which spiking neural networks require hidden layers. Our proof uses the deterministic mass-action kinetics formulation of chemical reaction networks. Specifically, we prove that a certain reaction network without hidden layers can learn a classification task previously proved to be achievable by a spiking neural network with hidden layers. We provide analytical regret bounds for the global behavior of the network and analyze its asymptotic behavior and Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension. In a numerical experiment, we confirm the learning capacity of the proposed chemical reaction network for classifying handwritten digits in pixel images, and we show that it solves the task more accurately and efficiently than a spiking neural network with hidden layers. This provides a motivation for machine learning in chemical computers and a mathematical explanation for how biological cells might exhibit more efficient learning behavior within biochemical reaction networks than neuronal networks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jaffard2026chemical,
  title  = {Chemical Reaction Networks Learn Better than Spiking Neural Networks},
  author = {Sophie Jaffard and Ivo F. Sbalzarini},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.12060},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12060v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.12060.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.12060)

Discussion