TurnWise: The Gap between Single- and Multi-turn Language Model Capabilities

Victoria Graf, Valentina Pyatkin, Nouha Dziri, Nathan Lambert, Hannaneh Hajishirzi
3/17/2026
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Multi-turn conversations are a common and critical mode of language model interaction. However, current open training and evaluation data focus on single-turn settings, failing to capture the additional dimension of these longer interactions. To understand this multi-/single-turn gap, we first introduce a new benchmark, TurnWiseEval, for multi-turn capabilities that is directly comparable to single-turn chat evaluation. Our evaluation isolates multi-turn specific conversational ability through pairwise comparison to equivalent single-turn settings. We additionally introduce our synthetic multi-turn data pipeline TurnWiseData which allows the scalable generation of multi-turn training data. Our experiments with Olmo 3 show that training with multi-turn data is vital to achieving strong multi-turn chat performance, and that including as little as 10k multi-turn conversations during post-training can lead to a 12% improvement on TurnWiseEval.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{graf2026turnwise,
  title  = {TurnWise: The Gap between Single- and Multi-turn Language Model Capabilities},
  author = {Victoria Graf and Valentina Pyatkin and Nouha Dziri and Nathan Lambert and Hannaneh Hajishirzi},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.16759},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16759v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.16759.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.16759)

Discussion