CRE-T1 Preview Technical Report: Beyond Contrastive Learning for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval

Guangzhi Wang, Yinghao Jiao, Zhi Liu
3/18/2026
cs.IRcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

The central challenge of reasoning-intensive retrieval lies in identifying implicitreasoning relationships between queries and documents, rather than superficial se-mantic or lexical similarity. The contrastive learning paradigm is fundamentallya static representation consolidation technique: during training, it encodes hier-archical relevance concepts into fixed geometric structures in the vector space,and at inference time it cannot dynamically adjust relevance judgments accord-ing to the specific reasoning demands of each query. Consequently, performancedegrades noticeably when vocabulary mismatch exists between queries and doc-uments or when implicit reasoning is required to establish relevance. This pa-per proposes Thought 1 (T1), a generative retrieval model that shifts relevancemodeling from static alignment to dynamic reasoning. On the query side, T1 dy-namically generates intermediate reasoning trajectories for each query to bridgeimplicit reasoning relationships and uses <embtoken> as a semantic aggregationpoint for the reasoning output. On the document side, it employs an instruction+ text + <embtoken> encoding format to support high-throughput indexing. Tointernalize dynamic reasoning capabilities into vector representations, we adopt athree-stage training curriculum and introduce GRPO in the third stage, enablingthe model to learn optimal derivation strategies for different queries through trial-and-error reinforcement learning. On the BRIGHT benchmark, T1-4B exhibitsstrong performance under the original query setting, outperforming larger modelstrained with contrastive learning overall, and achieving performance comparableto multi-stage retrieval pipelines. The results demonstrate that replacing static rep-resentation alignment with dynamic reasoning generation can effectively improvereasoning-intensive retrieval performance.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wang2026cret,
  title  = {CRE-T1 Preview Technical Report: Beyond Contrastive Learning for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval},
  author = {Guangzhi Wang and Yinghao Jiao and Zhi Liu},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.17387},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17387v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.17387.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.17387)

Discussion