Evolutionarily Stable Stackelberg Equilibrium

Sam Ganzfried
3/19/2026
cs.GTcs.AIcs.MA

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We present a new solution concept called evolutionarily stable Stackelberg equilibrium (SESS). We study the Stackelberg evolutionary game setting in which there is a single leading player and a symmetric population of followers. The leader selects an optimal mixed strategy, anticipating that the follower population plays an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) in the induced subgame and may satisfy additional ecological conditions. We consider both leader-optimal and follower-optimal selection among ESSs, which arise as special cases of our framework. Prior approaches to Stackelberg evolutionary games either define the follower response via evolutionary dynamics or assume rational best-response behavior, without explicitly enforcing stability against invasion by mutations. We present algorithms for computing SESS in discrete and continuous games, and validate the latter empirically. Our model applies naturally to biological settings; for example, in cancer treatment the leader represents the physician and the followers correspond to competing cancer cell phenotypes.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ganzfried2026evolutionarily,
  title  = {Evolutionarily Stable Stackelberg Equilibrium},
  author = {Sam Ganzfried},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.18385},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18385v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.18385.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.18385)

Discussion