AIMER: Calibration-Free Task-Agnostic MoE Pruning

Zongfang Liu, Shengkun Tang, Yifan Shen, Huan Wang, Xin Yuan
3/19/2026
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models increase parameter capacity without proportional per-token compute, but the deployment still requires storing all experts, making expert pruning important for reducing memory and serving overhead. Existing task-agnostic expert pruning methods are typically calibration-dependent: they estimate expert importance from routing or activation statistics on a calibration set, which makes pruning outcomes sensitive to the choice of calibration set and adds substantial preprocessing cost. We introduce AIMER (\textbf{A}bsolute mean over root mean square \textbf{IM}portance for \textbf{E}xpert \textbf{R}anking), a simple calibration-free criterion that yields clear within-layer score separation and distinct expert stratification. Across 7B to 30B MoE language models at 25\% and 50\% pruning ratios over 16 benchmarks, AIMER consistently delivers competitive or stronger overall performance against state-of-the-art calibration-based expert pruning baselines with only 0.22--1.27 seconds for scoring the experts.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{liu2026aimer,
  title  = {AIMER: Calibration-Free Task-Agnostic MoE Pruning},
  author = {Zongfang Liu and Shengkun Tang and Yifan Shen and Huan Wang and Xin Yuan},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.18492},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18492v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.18492.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.18492)

Discussion