FrameNet Semantic Role Classification by Analogy

Van-Duy Ngo, Stergos Afantenos, Emiliano Lorini, Miguel Couceiro
3/20/2026
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In this paper, we adopt a relational view of analogies applied to Semantic Role Classification in FrameNet. We define analogies as formal relations over the Cartesian product of frame evoking lexical units (LUs) and frame element (FEs) pairs, which we use to construct a new dataset. Each element of this binary relation is labelled as a valid analogical instance if the frame elements share the same semantic role, or as invalid otherwise. This formulation allows us to transform Semantic Role Classification into binary classification and train a lightweight Artificial Neural Network (ANN) that exhibits rapid convergence with minimal parameters. Unconventionally, no Semantic Role information is introduced to the neural network during training. We recover semantic roles during inference by computing probability distributions over candidates of all semantic roles within a given frame through random sampling and analogical transfer. This approach allows us to surpass previous state-of-the-art results while maintaining computational efficiency and frugality.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{ngo2026framenet,
  title  = {FrameNet Semantic Role Classification by Analogy},
  author = {Van-Duy Ngo and Stergos Afantenos and Emiliano Lorini and Miguel Couceiro},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.19825},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19825v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.19825.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.19825)

Discussion