Personality-Driven Student Agent-Based Modeling in Mathematics Education: How Well Do Student Agents Align with Human Learners?

Bushi Xiao, Qian Shen
3/22/2026
cs.MAcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

It is crucial to explore the impact of different teaching methods on student learning in educational research. However, real-person experiments face significant ethical constraints, and we cannot conduct repeated teaching experiments on the same student. LLM-based generative agents offer a promising avenue for simulating student behavior. Before large-scale experiments, a fundamental question must be addressed: are student agents truly credible, and can they faithfully simulate human learning? In this study, we built a Big Five Personality-based student agent model with a full pipeline of student-teacher interaction, self-study, and examination. To evaluate behavioral fidelity, we collected 13 empirical studies on Big Five traits and learning, and distilled them into 14 criteria. We found that the 71.4% of the student agents' behavior was aligned with human learners.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{xiao2026personalitydriven,
  title  = {Personality-Driven Student Agent-Based Modeling in Mathematics Education: How Well Do Student Agents Align with Human Learners?},
  author = {Bushi Xiao and Qian Shen},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.21358},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21358v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.21358.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.21358)

Discussion