PosterIQ: A Design Perspective Benchmark for Poster Understanding and Generation

Yuheng Feng, Wen Zhang, Haodong Duan, Xingxing Zou
3/25/2026
cs.CV

No official code found. Best implementation: ArtmeScienceLab/PosterIQ-Benchmark (9 stars, last commit 2026-04-07).

Abstract

We present PosterIQ, a design-driven benchmark for poster understanding and generation, annotated across composition structure, typographic hierarchy, and semantic intent. It includes 7,765 image-annotation instances and 822 generation prompts spanning real, professional, and synthetic cases. To bridge visual design cognition and generative modeling, we define tasks for layout parsing, text-image correspondence, typography/readability and font perception, design quality assessment, and controllable, composition-aware generation with metaphor. We evaluate state-of-the-art MLLMs and diffusion-based generators, finding persistent gaps in visual hierarchy, typographic semantics, saliency control, and intention communication; commercial models lead on high-level reasoning but act as insensitive automatic raters, while generators render text well yet struggle with composition-aware synthesis. Extensive analyses show PosterIQ is both a quantitative benchmark and a diagnostic tool for design reasoning, offering reproducible, task-specific metrics. We aim to catalyze models' creativity and integrate human-centred design principles into generative vision-language systems.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

[CVPR 2026] PosterIQ: A Design Perspective Benchmark for Poster Understanding and Generation

90PythonMar 23, 20266 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{feng2026posteriq,
  title  = {PosterIQ: A Design Perspective Benchmark for Poster Understanding and Generation},
  author = {Yuheng Feng and Wen Zhang and Haodong Duan and Xingxing Zou},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.24078},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24078v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.24078.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.24078)

Discussion