RenoBench: A Citation Parsing Benchmark

Parth Sarin, Juan Pablo Alperin, Adam Buttrick, Dione Mentis
3/26/2026
cs.DLcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Accurate parsing of citations is necessary for machine-readable scholarly infrastructure. But, despite sustained interest in this problem, existing evaluation techniques are often not generalizable, based on synthetic data, or not publicly available. We introduce RenoBench, a public domain benchmark for citation parsing, sourced from PDFs released on four publishing ecosystems: SciELO, Redalyc, the Public Knowledge Project, and Open Research Europe. Starting from 161,000 annotated citations, we apply automated validation and feature-based sampling to produce a dataset of 10,000 citations spanning multiple languages, publication types, and platforms. We then evaluate a variety of citation parsing systems and report field-level precision and recall. Our results show strong performance from language models, particularly when fine-tuned. RenoBench enables reproducible, standardized evaluation of citation parsing systems, and provides a foundation for advancing automated citation parsing and metascientific research.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sarin2026renobench,
  title  = {RenoBench: A Citation Parsing Benchmark},
  author = {Parth Sarin and Juan Pablo Alperin and Adam Buttrick and Dione Mentis},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.25640},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25640v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.25640.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.25640)

Discussion