CALRK-Bench: Evaluating Context-Aware Legal Reasoning in Korean Law

JiHyeok Jung, TaeYoung Yoon, HyunSouk Cho
3/27/2026
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Legal reasoning requires not only the application of legal rules but also an understanding of the context in which those rules operate. However, existing legal benchmarks primarily evaluate rule application under the assumption of fixed norms, and thus fail to capture situations where legal judgments shift or where multiple norms interact. In this work, we propose CALRK-Bench, a context-aware legal reasoning benchmark based on the legal system in Korean. CALRK-Bench evaluates whether models can identify the temporal validity of legal norms, determine whether sufficient legal information is available for a given case, and understand the reasons behind shifts in legal judgments. The dataset is constructed from legal precedents and legal consultation records, and is validated by legal experts. Experimental results show that even recent large language models consistently exhibit low performance on these three tasks. CALRK-Bench provides a new stress test for evaluating context-aware legal reasoning rather than simple memorization of legal knowledge. Our code is available at https://github.com/jhCOR/CALRKBench.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jung2026calrkbench,
  title  = {CALRK-Bench: Evaluating Context-Aware Legal Reasoning in Korean Law},
  author = {JiHyeok Jung and TaeYoung Yoon and HyunSouk Cho},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.26332},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26332v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.26332.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.26332)

Discussion