Optimized Weighted Voting System for Brain Tumor Classification Using MRI Images

Ha Anh Vu
3/30/2026
cs.CVcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

The accurate classification of brain tumors from MRI scans is essential for effective diagnosis and treatment planning. This paper presents a weighted ensemble learning approach that combines deep learning and traditional machine learning models to improve classification performance. The proposed system integrates multiple classifiers, including ResNet101, DenseNet121, Xception, CNN-MRI, and ResNet50 with edge-enhanced images, SVM, and KNN with HOG features. A weighted voting mechanism assigns higher influence to models with better individual accuracy, ensuring robust decision-making. Image processing techniques such as Balance Contrast Enhancement, K-means clustering, and Canny edge detection are applied to enhance feature extraction. Experimental evaluations on the Figshare and Kaggle MRI datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, outperforming existing models. These findings highlight the potential of ensemble-based learning for improving brain tumor classification, offering a reliable and scalable framework for medical image analysis.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{vu2026optimized,
  title  = {Optimized Weighted Voting System for Brain Tumor Classification Using MRI Images},
  author = {Ha Anh Vu},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.28357},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28357v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.28357.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.28357)

Discussion