Nash Approximation Gap in Truncated Infinite-horizon Partially Observable Markov Games

Lan Sang, Chinmay Maheshwari
4/6/2026
cs.MAeess.SY

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Partially Observable Markov Games (POMGs) provide a general framework for modeling multi-agent sequential decision-making under asymmetric information. A common approach is to reformulate a POMG as a fully observable Markov game over belief states, where the state is the conditional distribution of the system state and agents' private information given common information, and actions correspond to mappings (prescriptions) from private information to actions. However, this reformulation is intractable in infinite-horizon settings, as both the belief state and action spaces grow with the accumulation of information over time. We propose a finite-memory truncation framework that approximates infinite-horizon POMGs by a finite-state, finite-action Markov game, where agents condition decisions only on finite windows of common and private information. Under suitable filter stability (forgetting) conditions, we show that any Nash equilibrium of the truncated game is an $\varepsilon$-Nash equilibrium of the original POMG, where $\varepsilon \to 0$ as the truncation length increases.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sang2026nash,
  title  = {Nash Approximation Gap in Truncated Infinite-horizon Partially Observable Markov Games},
  author = {Lan Sang and Chinmay Maheshwari},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2604.05131},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05131v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2604.05131.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2604.05131)

Discussion