SAT: Balancing Reasoning Accuracy and Efficiency with Stepwise Adaptive Thinking

Weiyang Huang, Xuefeng Bai, Kehai Chen, Xinyang Chen, Yibin Chen +2 more
4/9/2026
cs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have revolutionized complex problem-solving, yet they exhibit a pervasive "overthinking", generating unnecessarily long reasoning chains. While current solutions improve token efficiency, they often sacrifice fine-grained control or risk disrupting the logical integrity of the reasoning process. To address this, we introduce Stepwise Adaptive Thinking (SAT), a framework that performs step-level, difficulty-aware pruning while preserving the core reasoning structure. SAT formulates reasoning as a Finite-State Machine (FSM) with distinct thinking modes (Slow, Normal, Fast, Skip). It navigates these states dynamically using a lightweight Process Reward Model (PRM), compressing easy steps while preserving depth for hard ones. Experiments across 9 LRMs and 7 benchmarks show that SAT achieves up to 40% reduction in reasoning tokens while generally maintaining or improving accuracy.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{huang2026sat,
  title  = {SAT: Balancing Reasoning Accuracy and Efficiency with Stepwise Adaptive Thinking},
  author = {Weiyang Huang and Xuefeng Bai and Kehai Chen and Xinyang Chen and Yibin Chen and Weili Guan and Min Zhang},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2604.07922},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07922v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2604.07922.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2604.07922)

Discussion