Randomly Initialized Networks Can Learn from Peer-to-Peer Consensus

Esteban Rodríguez-Betancourt, Edgar Casasola-Murillo
4/20/2026
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In self-supervised learning, self-distilled methods have shown impressive performance, learning representations useful for downstream tasks and even displaying emergent properties. However, state-of-the-art methods usually rely on ensembles of complex mechanisms, with many design choices that are empirically motivated and not well understood. In this work, we explore the role of self-distillation within learning dynamics. Specifically, we isolate the effect of self-distillation by training a group of randomly initialized networks, removing all other common components such as projectors, predictors, and even pretext tasks. Our findings show that even this minimal setup can lead to learned representations with non-trivial improvements over a random baseline on downstream tasks. We also demonstrate how this effect varies with different hyperparameters and present a short analysis of what is being learned by the models under this setup.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{rodrguezbetancourt2026randomly,
  title  = {Randomly Initialized Networks Can Learn from Peer-to-Peer Consensus},
  author = {Esteban Rodríguez-Betancourt and Edgar Casasola-Murillo},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2604.18390},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18390v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2604.18390.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2604.18390)

Discussion