Beyond Single Plots: A Benchmark for Question Answering on Multi-Charts

Azher Ahmed Efat, Seok Hwan Song, Wallapak Tavanapong
4/23/2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Charts are widely used to present complex information. Deriving meaningful insights in real-world contexts often requires interpreting multiple related charts together. Research on understanding multi-chart images has not been extensively explored. We introduce PolyChartQA, a mid-scale dataset specifically designed for question answering over multi-chart images. PolyChartQA comprises 534 multi-chart images (with a total of 2,297 sub-charts) sourced from peer-reviewed computer science research publications and 2,694 QA pairs. We evaluate the performance of nine state-of-the-art Multimodal Language Models (MLMs) on PolyChartQA across question type, difficulty, question source, and key structural characteristics of multi-charts. Our results show a 27.4% LLM-based accuracy (L-Accuracy) drop on human-authored questions compared to MLM-generated questions, and a 5.39% L-accuracy gain with our proposed prompting method.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{efat2026beyond,
  title  = {Beyond Single Plots: A Benchmark for Question Answering on Multi-Charts},
  author = {Azher Ahmed Efat and Seok Hwan Song and Wallapak Tavanapong},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2604.21344},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21344v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2604.21344.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2604.21344)

Discussion