A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Tweet Sentiment Classification: A Case Study on the Sentiment140 Dataset

Vita Anggraini, Cintya Bella, Bastian, Luluk Muthoharoh, Ardika Satria +1 more
5/6/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The exponential growth of social media has created an urgent need for automated systems to analyze unstructured public sentiment in real time. This study compares a traditional Logistic Regression model using TF-IDF features with a deep learning Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) architecture on a 10,000-tweet subset of the Sentiment140 dataset. Experimental results show that Logistic Regression outperformed BiLSTM, achieving an accuracy of 73.5% compared with 69.17%, while the deep learning model exhibited mild overfitting. These findings suggest that for medium-scale informal text data, classical machine learning with robust feature extraction can outperform more complex deep learning approaches. Finally, the trained models were integrated into an interactive web application using Streamlit and deployed on Hugging Face Spaces for public access.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{anggraini2026comparative,
  title  = {A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Tweet Sentiment Classification: A Case Study on the Sentiment140 Dataset},
  author = {Vita Anggraini and Cintya Bella and Bastian and Luluk Muthoharoh and Ardika Satria and Martin C. T. Manullang},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2605.04888},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04888v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2605.04888.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2605.04888)

Discussion