Property-Level Reconstructability of Agent Decisions: An Anchor-Level Pilot Across Vendor SDK Adapter Regimes

Oleg Solozobov
5/12/2026
cs.SEcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: agent-runtime-evidence/anchor-level-reconstructability-pilot (0 stars, last commit 2026-05-13).

Abstract

Agentic AI failures need post-hoc reconstruction: what the agent did, on whose authority, against which policy, and from what reasoning. Cross-regime feasibility remains unmeasured under one property-level schema. We apply the Decision Trace Reconstructor unmodified to pinned worked-example anchors from six public vendor SDK regimes spanning cloud-agent, observability, tool-use, telemetry, and protocol traces, plus two comparator columns. Each Decision Event Schema (DES) property is classified as fully fillable, partially fillable, structurally unfillable, or opaque. Per-property reconstructability of an agent decision already varies between regimes at this anchor scale. Strict-governance-completeness separates into three tiers ranging from 42.9% to 85.7%, yielding one regime-independent gap (reasoning trace), four regime-dependent gaps, and one Mixed property; the pilot is single-annotator, one anchor per cell, descriptive, with outputs checksum-verifiable from a deposited reproducibility package.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Reproducibility package for an arXiv pilot measuring property-level reconstructability of agent decisions across vendor SDK adapter regimes.

00May 8, 20265 months agoNOASSERTION
agent-runtimeagentic-aiai-agentsarxivdecision-trace+4 more

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{solozobov2026propertylevel,
  title  = {Property-Level Reconstructability of Agent Decisions: An Anchor-Level Pilot Across Vendor SDK Adapter Regimes},
  author = {Oleg Solozobov},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2605.12078},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12078v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2605.12078.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2605.12078)

Discussion