Isotonic Survival Regression: Calibrated Survival Distributions from Deep Cox Models

Anchit Jain, Kevin Zhang, Stephen Bates
5/15/2026
stat.MLcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Time-to-event data is widespread across the life sciences and engineering, but it is typically encountered together with censoring, which complicates the application of standard machine learning methods. Deep Cox models have emerged as a popular method for analyzing time-to-event data because they gracefully handle censoring and can be used with unstructured data such as clinical text reports, genomic sequences, and pathology images. However, their predicted survival probabilities are often poorly calibrated, thus limiting their practical utility. In this paper, we propose a novel post hoc calibration method for Deep Cox models that uses isotonic regression to refine predicted survival probabilities without affecting discriminative power. We establish favorable theoretical guarantees, including a double-robustness property and asymptotic calibration. Experiments on synthetic and real-world clinical data demonstrate the empirical effectiveness of our method.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jain2026isotonic,
  title  = {Isotonic Survival Regression: Calibrated Survival Distributions from Deep Cox Models},
  author = {Anchit Jain and Kevin Zhang and Stephen Bates},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2605.16571},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16571v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2605.16571.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2605.16571)

Discussion