Smarter edits? Post-editing with error highlights and translation suggestions

Fleur V. J. van Tellingen, Gautam Ranka, Dora Žugčić, Joyce van der Wal, Andrea Camasta +2 more
5/20/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

As MT quality increases, interest in enhanced post-editing features such as QE-derived error highlights is growing, yet evidence for their usefulness remains limited. In this work, we explore the usefulness of LLM-derived error highlights and correction suggestions based on automatic post-editing (APE). We conduct a study where professional translators (En-Nl) post-edit translations using APE error highlights and correction suggestions and compare productivity, quality and user experience to regular PE and PE with QE-derived highlights. While no condition yielded productivity or quality gains compared to regular PE, APE highlights were better received than QE-derived highlights, and correction suggestions improved overall user experience.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{tellingen2026smarter,
  title  = {Smarter edits? Post-editing with error highlights and translation suggestions},
  author = {Fleur V. J. van Tellingen and Gautam Ranka and Dora Žugčić and Joyce van der Wal and Andrea Camasta and Livio Guerra and Alina Karakanta},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2605.21135},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21135v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2605.21135.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2605.21135)

Discussion