Hallucination Mitigation with Agentic AI, Nested Learning, and AI Sustainability via Semantic Caching

Diego Gosmar, Deborah A. Dahl
5/27/2026
cs.AIcs.MA

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Hallucination remains a major reliability barrier for production LLM systems, particularly in multi-agent pipelines where unsupported claims can propagate unchecked across stages. This paper adapts a HOPE-inspired Nested Learning architecture with Continuum Memory Systems (CMS) and semantic similarity caching to a hybrid benchmark of 310 prompts combining 217 epistemic-uncertainty prompts and 93 fabrication-induction stress-test prompts. A three-stage agentic pipeline orchestrated via the Open Floor Protocol (OFP) is evaluated with five KPIs -- FCD (Factual Claim Density), FGR (Factual Grounding References), FDF (Fictional Disclaimer Frequency), ECS (Explicit Contextualization Score), and OSR (Observability Score Ratio) -- aggregated into THS (Total Hallucination Score) across five weighting configurations to study mitigation-observability trade-offs. FDF, ECS, OSR, and FGR are subtracted as mitigation signals, so that a more negative THS indicates stronger mitigation. The FrontEndAgent is configured as a high-stochasticity generator (temperature = 1.0) to produce a realistic hallucination baseline, while the SecondLevelReviewer and ThirdLevelReviewer operate as progressive correctors. This asymmetric design yields end-to-end THS reductions of -31.3% to -35.9% across five weighting configurations. Semantic caching achieves 440 cache hits over 930 potential calls (47.3% hit rate), reducing LLM invocations to 490, lowering energy and CO2e footprint, and making multi-stage review pipelines operationally viable at production scale. ExtremeObservability attains the most negative final THS (-0.0709), confirming that observability-heavy configurations reinforce rather than compromise mitigation. These findings suggest that memory-augmented multi-agent designs can jointly improve factual reliability, operational efficiency, and auditability without model retraining.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gosmar2026hallucination,
  title  = {Hallucination Mitigation with Agentic AI, Nested Learning, and AI Sustainability via Semantic Caching},
  author = {Diego Gosmar and Deborah A. Dahl},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2605.29055},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29055v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2605.29055.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2605.29055)

Discussion