Cross-modal linkage risk in clinical vision-language models

Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh, Mahshad Lotfinia, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn
6/1/2026
cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) trained on paired chest radiographs and radiology reports learn a shared embedding space that can preserve instance-level image-report correspondence. This poses a privacy risk in settings where radiographs and reports are deliberately kept separate after acquisition, such as image-only data sharing or access-controlled reports, because a de-identified image may be re-linked to its original narrative report through cosine similarity alone. We formalized this as image-to-report retrieval and used public paired cohorts, in which the true pairing is known by design, as ground-truth benchmarks to audit the risk rather than as the privacy scenario. Evaluating VLMs of increasing clinical specialization on 406,241 paired examples from 126,804 patients across MIMIC-CXR (43,793 held-out pairs) and external CheXpert Plus (29,296 pairs), we found that re-linkage rose systematically with specialization: the strongest VLM retrieved the correct report at 15 times chance at a candidate pool of N = 100, 50 times chance at N = 10,000, and well above chance at full-database scale. The signal persisted under pathology-matched hard negatives that removed disease-label shortcuts, indicating correspondence beyond broad diagnostic categories. To reduce it without retraining, we froze both encoders and applied differentially private optimization only to the projection heads defining the alignment layer (epsilon = 0.34, delta = 6x10-6). This reduced Recall@1 by 61.8% at N = 10,000 on MIMIC-CXR and transferred to CheXpert Plus without retraining, while image-side utility was largely preserved: macro AUROC for linear-probe classification across 14 labels shifted only from 79.63% to 79.43%. Targeted DP finetuning of the shared alignment layer can substantially reduce cross-modal re-linkage without materially degrading the image representations that make these models clinically useful.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{arasteh2026crossmodal,
  title  = {Cross-modal linkage risk in clinical vision-language models},
  author = {Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh and Mahshad Lotfinia and Sven Nebelung and Daniel Truhn},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2606.02276},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02276v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2606.02276.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2606.02276)

Discussion