Doing well with less! On Sampling Techniques for Empirical Pairwise Loss Estimation/Minimization

Louise Davy, Stephan Clémençon, Charlotte Laclau
6/1/2026
stat.MLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Many machine learning problems, including similarity learning, ranking, and clustering, rely on empirical pairwise loss functions whose quadratic computational cost quickly becomes prohibitive at scale. We demonstrate how a frugal approach that retains only a fraction of the available information on pairs can achieve estimation or optimization performance comparable to that obtained by using all pairs, by leveraging survey sampling techniques. A central finding, supported by both theory and experiments, is that such sampling plans must target pairs directly rather than individual observations. In particular, for pairwise losses between high-dimensional vectors such as embeddings in vision or graph learning, assigning higher inclusion probabilities to informative pairs using suitable auxiliary information yields performance close to full pairwise evaluation, providing a principled and theoretically grounded trade-off between accuracy and computational cost.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{davy2026doing,
  title  = {Doing well with less! On Sampling Techniques for Empirical Pairwise Loss Estimation/Minimization},
  author = {Louise Davy and Stephan Clémençon and Charlotte Laclau},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2606.02345},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02345v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2606.02345.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2606.02345)

Discussion