Which LoRA? An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of LoRA Techniques During Multilingual Instruction Tuning

Thamali Wijewardhana, Napoleon H. Reyes, Surangika Ranathunga
6/9/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We investigate whether commonly available LoRA variants have an advantage over basic LoRA in multilingual instruction tuning. Experiments involving LoRA and four other variants on two datasets across diverse target languages show that there is no significant advantage in using more complex LoRA variants instead of basic LoRA, with respect to balancing cross-lingual transfer and knowledge retention. An analysis of hidden embeddings reveal that layer-wise language representation remains largely similar across LLMs fine-tuned with different LoRA techniques, suggesting that architectural novelty of LoRA techniques may not translate into better cross-lingual adaptation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wijewardhana2026which,
  title  = {Which LoRA? An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of LoRA Techniques During Multilingual Instruction Tuning},
  author = {Thamali Wijewardhana and Napoleon H. Reyes and Surangika Ranathunga},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2606.10428},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10428v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2606.10428.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2606.10428)

Discussion