PhysMetrics.Weather: An Evaluation Framework for Physical Consistency in ML Weather Models

Emma Kasteleyn, Timo Maier, Axel Lauer, Veronika Eyring, Pierre Gentine +1 more
6/9/2026
cs.LGphysics.ao-ph

Official code: Emmakast/PhysMetrics.Weather (23 stars, MIT, last commit 2026-06-09).

Abstract

Machine learning weather prediction (MLWP) models have achieved impressive forecasting performance at a small fraction of the computational costs required for traditional physics-based methods. However, they are primarily (1) data-driven and (2) evaluated using pixel-wide error metrics (e.g., RMSE), so there are no guarantees that their forecasts are consistent with known physical laws. We introduce PhysMetrics.Weather, an evaluation framework that assesses the physical realism of MLWP models across three types of metrics: conservation, spectral, and dynamical. By quantifying physical realism, this tool guides the development of physics-informed architectures and helps evaluate whether MLWP models are reliable for operational use. Our framework is available on Github at https://github.com/Emmakast/PhysMetrics.Weather.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT
232Python, Jupyter NotebookApr 23, 20264 months agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kasteleyn2026physmetricsweather,
  title  = {PhysMetrics.Weather: An Evaluation Framework for Physical Consistency in ML Weather Models},
  author = {Emma Kasteleyn and Timo Maier and Axel Lauer and Veronika Eyring and Pierre Gentine and Ana Lucic},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2606.10642},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10642v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2606.10642.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2606.10642)

Discussion