PAWS: Preference Learning with Advantage-Weighted Segments

Aleksandar Taranovic, Onur Celik, Niklas Freymuth, Ge Li, Serge Thilges +4 more
6/10/2026
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) learns policies from human trajectory-level comparisons, avoiding explicit reward design and expert demonstrations. Existing methods typically train utility functions on trajectory or segment-level preferences while relying on per-step utility estimates during policy optimization. This training and inference mismatch induces a distribution shift that severely degrades temporal credit assignment and limits policy learning. We analyze this issue and propose PAWS, a segment-based preference learning method that performs policy updates directly using segment-level advantage functions. By aligning utility training with policy optimization, PAWS preserves trajectory-level preference information and avoids unreliable per-step learning signals. Experiments on simulated robotic manipulation and locomotion tasks demonstrate that PAWS consistently outperforms existing PbRL approaches, highlighting the importance of distribution-consistent preference learning.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{taranovic2026paws,
  title  = {PAWS: Preference Learning with Advantage-Weighted Segments},
  author = {Aleksandar Taranovic and Onur Celik and Niklas Freymuth and Ge Li and Serge Thilges and Huy Le and Tai Hoang and Rania Rayyes and Gerhard Neumann},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2606.11982},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11982v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2606.11982.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2606.11982)

Discussion