A Context-Aware Dataset for Stance Detection in Bioethical Controversies on Reddit

Hu Huang, Genan Dai, Fuqiang Niu, Yi Yang, Zhaoya Gong +1 more
6/11/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Bioethical debates increasingly unfold on social media, yet stance detection research lacks large-scale, domain-specific resources for modeling such context-dependent discourse. We present BioStance, a context-aware dataset of 39,600 annotated Post-Comment pairs from Reddit bioethical discussions. BioStance covers six controversial targets across three dimensions of bioethical controversy: fundamental value conflicts, individual liberty versus collective responsibility, and technological uncertainty. Each instance preserves hierarchical conversational context and is labeled by three independent annotators using a three-class stance scheme: Favor, Against, and None. The annotations achieve a mean Krippendorff's $α$ of 0.82, indicating substantial reliability. By combining thematic diversity, conversational structure, and high-quality human annotation, BioStance supports research on context-aware stance detection, argument mining, and computational analysis of bioethical discourse.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{huang2026contextaware,
  title  = {A Context-Aware Dataset for Stance Detection in Bioethical Controversies on Reddit},
  author = {Hu Huang and Genan Dai and Fuqiang Niu and Yi Yang and Zhaoya Gong and Bowen Zhang},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2606.13187},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13187v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2606.13187.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2606.13187)

Discussion