Brick: Spatial Capability Routing for the Mixture-of-Models (MoM) Paradigm

Francesco Massa, Marco Cristofanilli
6/11/2026
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Defining query difficulty is one of the hardest problems in deployment engineering. Existing LLM routers rely on surface features such as domain labels, keywords, and token count, ignoring the within-domain variance that actually determines model success. Frontier models cost ten to one hundred times more than local open-weight models, so at production scale even small per-request savings become a direct cloud-bill lever. We present Brick, a multimodal router that scores each model on six capability dimensions, combines this with a per-query difficulty estimate, and dispatches via a cost-penalized geometric rule. A continuous preference knob lets operators slide between max-quality and max-saving profiles at deploy time. On a benchmark of 5,504 queries, Brick at max-quality reaches 76.98% accuracy, beating the best single model (75.02%) and all tested routers. At a neutral cost-quality profile, Brick achieves 74.11% accuracy at 4.71x lower cost than always using the strongest model. At min-cost, it cuts cost 22.15x with 11.85 points accuracy loss. Median latency drops from 51.2s to 22.8s.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{massa2026brick,
  title  = {Brick: Spatial Capability Routing for the Mixture-of-Models (MoM) Paradigm},
  author = {Francesco Massa and Marco Cristofanilli},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2606.13241},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13241v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2606.13241.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2606.13241)

Discussion