As Easy as Rocket Science: Assessing the Ability of Large Language Models to Interpret Negation in Figurative Language

Jasmine Owers, Edwin Simpson, Martha Lewis
6/17/2026
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Figurative language and negation are two areas that challenge current language models, however, both are widely used throughout written and spoken language. Large language models (LLMs) are also widely used in everyday contexts where they cannot necessarily be tuned for a specific dataset. It is therefore essential to understand the ability of LLMs to correctly interpret text that includes both negation and figurative language. To investigate this, we develop a set of new annotations to an existing dataset of figurative language, and test a range of language models on the dataset. We find that the combination of negation and figurativeness can present a particular challenge, and that performance overall and across different negation types is particularly dependent on the prompt style used.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{owers2026easy,
  title  = {As Easy as Rocket Science: Assessing the Ability of Large Language Models to Interpret Negation in Figurative Language},
  author = {Jasmine Owers and Edwin Simpson and Martha Lewis},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2606.18922},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18922v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2606.18922.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2606.18922)

Discussion