Non-asymptotic estimates of the minimal risk in statistical learning

Liming Wu, Sen Yang
6/22/2026
cs.LGmath.PRstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In this paper we prove some concentration inequalities for two types of error probabilities in the Empirical Risk Principle (ERP) in statistical learning, which provide a lower bound and an upper bound for the minimal risk (in terms of the minimal empirical risk) with non-asymptotic high confidence. The usual boundedness condition of the empirical risk function is relaxed to the Gaussian or exponential integrability condition. The confidence of the lower bound of the minimal risk is shown to be independent of the number of training parameters and the dimension of the input vectors, allowing one to detect the deficiency of a learning machine efficiently; and the confidence of the upper bound of the minimal risk is proved to be high provided that the sample size $n$ is much greater than the box dimension of the parameter set $Θ$ in the Orlicz metric $d_{ψ_1}$ associated with the risk functions. Our work is based on Talagrand's concentration inequalities (the sharp versions by Bousquet and Klein-Rio), transport-entropy inequalities and the recent progress in the theory of empirical processes and statistical learning.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wu2026nonasymptotic,
  title  = {Non-asymptotic estimates of the minimal risk in statistical learning},
  author = {Liming Wu and Sen Yang},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2606.23295},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23295v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2606.23295.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2606.23295)

Discussion