LaGO: Latent Action Guidance for Online Reinforcement Learning

Kuan-Yen Liu, Ren-Jyun Huang, Ti-Rong Wu
6/23/2026
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for planning and sequential decision-making, but prior work often relies on using them as direct controllers, which requires precise action generation and can be unreliable in practice. This paper proposes Latent Action Guidance for Online Reinforcement Learning (LaGO), a framework that uses a pretrained LLM as a latent action prior to softly guide online policy optimization, rather than treating the LLM as an explicit planner or controller. Experiments on both a discrete-control benchmark, CLEVR-Robot, and a continuous-control benchmark, Meta-World, demonstrate that LaGO consistently improves both reward and success rate over Vanilla PPO. In particular, LaGO increases the average success rate from 15.1% to 27.2% on CLEVR-Robot and from 2.7% to 15.2% on Meta-World. Our analysis further shows that stronger pretrained LLMs provide more effective guidance, suggesting that LLM knowledge can improve planning and online decision-making.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{liu2026lago,
  title  = {LaGO: Latent Action Guidance for Online Reinforcement Learning},
  author = {Kuan-Yen Liu and Ren-Jyun Huang and Ti-Rong Wu},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2606.24669},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24669v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2606.24669.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2606.24669)

Discussion