Robust Strategic Classification under Decision-Dependent Cost Uncertainty

Sura Alhanouti, Güzin Bayraksan, Parinaz Naghizadeh
6/29/2026
cs.LGcs.GT

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Humans facing algorithmic decision systems have been found to ``game'' them by altering their input data (at a cost to them) in order to favorably change the algorithmic outcomes they receive (at a cost to the algorithm). The growing literature on strategic classification seeks to develop robust machine learning algorithms that account for, and reduce, unwanted strategic behavior. A limitation of these existing works is that they assume the cost of strategic behavior to be fixed and independent of the classifier's decision. In practice, however, manipulation costs evolve and depend on past algorithmic decisions: today's decisions influence tomorrow's costs. This paper proposes and analyzes a two-stage robust optimization framework with a decision-dependent uncertainty set to capture such dependencies. We highlight that awareness of policy-dependent costs not only reduces uncertainty, but also better curtails gaming of the algorithmic system over time.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{alhanouti2026robust,
  title  = {Robust Strategic Classification under Decision-Dependent Cost Uncertainty},
  author = {Sura Alhanouti and Güzin Bayraksan and Parinaz Naghizadeh},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2606.30136},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30136v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2606.30136.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2606.30136)

Discussion