Evidence-State Rewards for Long-Context Reasoning

Ya Gao, Pekka Marttinen
7/2/2026
cs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Long-context reasoning requires models to locate, revise, and synthesize evidence distributed across lengthy inputs. Existing long-context RL methods usually reward final answers or static evidence extraction, offering little feedback on how intermediate actions change the model's evidence state. We propose Maven, a reinforcement learning framework with an editable evidence memory. Maven defines an answer-conditioned evidence-state value and rewards action-level state transitions: add actions are credited by marginal gain and hindsight contribution, link actions by evidence synergy, and drop actions by improved answer support after removing misleading evidence. These rewards are assigned to the corresponding action spans in GRPO. Across Llama and Qwen models on LongBench v2, LongReason, and RULER, Maven outperforms outcome-only RL and evidence-identification baselines, producing more sufficient evidence sets and lower distractor retention. Our results show that long-context RL benefits from optimizing stateful evidence navigation rather than one-shot evidence extraction.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gao2026evidencestate,
  title  = {Evidence-State Rewards for Long-Context Reasoning},
  author = {Ya Gao and Pekka Marttinen},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2607.02073},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02073v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2607.02073.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2607.02073)

Discussion