Generalizing Preference-based Reinforcement Learning: a Rationality Model for Incomparability

Simone Drago, Marco Mussi, Leonardo Bianconi, Alberto Maria Metelli
7/13/2026
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In this work, we study the reinforcement learning (RL) problem from pairwise trajectory comparisons provided by a human expert. We generalize preference-based RL by formalizing a novel setting in which the expert can also label trajectory pairs as incomparable, i.e., when neither trajectory dominates the other. We introduce the learning problem and the desiderata that its solution should satisfy. Then, we propose a novel Bradley-Terry-inspired rationality model that effectively captures incomparabilities and infers a multi-dimensional reward function, and we study its properties. We provide a sample complexity analysis for learning the model parameters when a dataset is available. Finally, we evaluate our model's ability to reconstruct a reward function that aligns with the expert's comparisons in simulated environments and to recover the Pareto frontier of policies, along with a robustness analysis across varying levels of expert rationality.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{drago2026generalizing,
  title  = {Generalizing Preference-based Reinforcement Learning: a Rationality Model for Incomparability},
  author = {Simone Drago and Marco Mussi and Leonardo Bianconi and Alberto Maria Metelli},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2607.11432},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11432v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2607.11432.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2607.11432)

Discussion