Trace: A Taxonomy-Guided Environment for Multidomain Visual Reasoning

Md Tanvirul Alam
7/22/2026
cs.CV

No official code found. Best implementation: maveryn/trace (3 stars, Apache-2.0, last commit 2026-07-22).

Abstract

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has substantially improved language-model reasoning, yet its extension to vision-language models remains constrained by the lack of training data that are simultaneously broad, exactly verifiable, and reproducible. We introduce Trace, a taxonomy-guided environment for multidomain visual reasoning. Trace factorizes task construction into a scene grammar and an executable task program, separating visual realization from answer computation. A shared semantic state determines the rendered image, prompt, typed answer, verifier state, and replayable instance trace. The resulting environment comprises 1,000 tasks over 277 scene grammars and 11 visual domains, with controlled semantic and visual variation. RLVR on 64,000 Trace instances improves the macro-average across 24 external benchmarks by 3.51 percentage points for Qwen2.5-VL-3B and 4.06 points for Qwen2.5-VL-7B, providing evidence that broad procedural training can transfer beyond the generated task distributions. Project page: https://maveryn.github.io/trace/.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

maveryn/traceCommunity75%
Apache-2.0

Trace: A Taxonomy-Guided Environment for Multidomain Visual Reasoning

30Jul 17, 20263 months agoApache-2.0
benchmarkmultimodalprocedural-generationreinforcement-learningrlvr+3 more

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{alam2026trace,
  title  = {Trace: A Taxonomy-Guided Environment for Multidomain Visual Reasoning},
  author = {Md Tanvirul Alam},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2607.19790},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19790v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2607.19790.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2607.19790)

Discussion