Entity Resolution in Practice: Lessons from a Self-Serve Pipeline

Kaushik Pavani, Ganga Aluri, Pravin Jadhav, Neeraj Prasad, Kiran Sanka
7/28/2026
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

We built and evaluated a self-serve entity resolution (ER) system on six benchmarks spanning 864 to 5M records, and three lessons emerged that are absent from existing ER literature. (1) No single matching algorithm wins everywhere - a self-serve pipeline cannot predict its next dataset, so we recommend training several algorithm families per dataset and letting an automatic bake-off pick the winner. (2) Precision and recall need separate fixes, not a shared threshold - precision needs hard rule-based vetoes, recall needs more diverse candidate retrieval. (3) One false-positive link can silently merge unrelated entities - assuming "A matches B" and "B matches C" implies "A matches C" lets a single bad link chain hundreds of records together, so every cross-group merge must be actively re-verified. We hope these lessons save practitioners the months of dead-end experiments that led us to them.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{pavani2026entity,
  title  = {Entity Resolution in Practice: Lessons from a Self-Serve Pipeline},
  author = {Kaushik Pavani and Ganga Aluri and Pravin Jadhav and Neeraj Prasad and Kiran Sanka},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2607.26298},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26298v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2607.26298.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2607.26298)

Discussion