Provable Quantum--Classical Separation for Continuous Gibbs Sampling

Enrico Olivucci, Mariia Sobchuk, Sehmimul Hoque, Jeffrey Hnybida, Kyungho W. Kim +2 more
8/25/2026
quant-phcs.DScs.ET

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We prove the first quantum--classical separation for a sampling problem over a continuous domain. For a class of Gibbs states $p\propto e^{-βE}$ on the torus $\mathbb{T}^d$ with smooth ($s$-Gevrey) potential and barrier amplitude $α=e^{βΔ}$, where $Δ= \max E-\min E$, every classical algorithm---querying the value, gradient, or any higher-order derivatives of the log-density---requires $Ω(α)$ queries to sample at constant accuracy in total variation distance, while a quantum algorithm based on quantum singular value thresholding and temperature annealing samples with $\tilde{O}\left(\sqrtα\right)$ queries to an oracle for the gradient. The advantage is quadratic in the barrier amplitude, which becomes exponential in the dimension, $e^{Ω(d)}$, at low temperature. The classical bound is information-theoretic, holding for every classical algorithm with query access to the Gibbs potential and its derivatives at any order.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{olivucci2026provable,
  title  = {Provable Quantum--Classical Separation for Continuous Gibbs Sampling},
  author = {Enrico Olivucci and Mariia Sobchuk and Sehmimul Hoque and Jeffrey Hnybida and Kyungho W. Kim and Ala Shayeghi and Pooya Ronagh},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2608.24527},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24527v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2608.24527.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2608.24527)

Discussion