Data-driven Effective Modeling of Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks

Yuan Chen, Weize Mao, Dongbin Xiu
8/26/2026
math.NAcs.LGmath.DS

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

The Stochastic Simulation Algorithm (SSA), widely considered an exact algorithm for stochastic chemical reaction networks, suffers from high computational cost. In this work, we propose a data-driven effective model that operates on a user-defined coarse time step independent of the underlying microscopic reaction-event scale. This is accomplished by directly approximating the finite-time transition kernel of the continuous-time Markov chain induced by SSA, using a generative machine learning model trained on short bursts of SSA simulation data. The trained model constructs a stochastic propagator that recursively generates statistically consistent trajectories at the constant coarse time step, with significantly reduced computational cost. In this paper, we employ conditional normalizing flow as the stochastic propagator. A comprehensive set of numerical examples is presented to demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chen2026datadriven,
  title  = {Data-driven Effective Modeling of Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks},
  author = {Yuan Chen and Weize Mao and Dongbin Xiu},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2608.25421},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25421v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2608.25421.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2608.25421)

Discussion