Towards Expert Financial QA via Self-Improving RAG

Junjie Xiong, Shawheen Ghezavat, Aum Hirpara
8/27/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Expert-level financial question answering requires both grounded verification to catch numeric hallucinations and audit trails for regulatory compliance, attributes that standard single-pass RAG systems lack. We take a step toward this goal with Self-Improving RAG, a framework that decomposes document QA into three specialized agents (Retrieval, Reasoning, and Judge) coordinated by an orchestrator with feedback-driven self-correction. When the Judge Agent scores an answer below a dynamic threshold, the system triggers retry with escalated strategies: broader retrieval, more careful prompting, and relaxed acceptance criteria. We evaluate on FinanceBench (SEC filing QA), where Self-Improving RAG achieves 86% oracle-guided accuracy (measuring agreement with gold answers) with a 36.4% Lazarus Rate, recovering nearly 4 in 10 initially incorrect answers through targeted retry. A key finding is that a fixed retrieval pipeline with judge-driven retry achieves strong results without dynamic routing, providing full interpretability. Every decision is logged with confidence scores, enabling the audit trails required for regulated financial applications.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{xiong2026towards,
  title  = {Towards Expert Financial QA via Self-Improving RAG},
  author = {Junjie Xiong and Shawheen Ghezavat and Aum Hirpara},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2608.26706},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26706v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2608.26706.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2608.26706)

Discussion