What Emerges and What Breaks in Self-Play Driving

Laur Sisask, Ardi Tampuu, Tambet Matiisen
8/31/2026
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Training autonomous driving policies through pure self-play has recently shown promising results. Following Gigaflow and Puffer- Drive, we train driving policies in a similar self-play fashion, but extend the models from MLPs to Transformers and train on the high-definition map of a real city, where we ultimately aim to deploy them. On the CARLA and Waymax benchmarks, our policies fall short of Gigaflow, and we trace the gap to specific failure modes, including reward hacking at traffic lights and a missing incentive to stop at stop signs. We further analyze which traffic rules emerge from self-play and how closely they match human driving, and we confirm that reward conditioning yields the intended diversity of driving behaviors. A demonstration of a trained policy is available at https://laursisask-ut.github.io/eccvdemo.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sisask2026what,
  title  = {What Emerges and What Breaks in Self-Play Driving},
  author = {Laur Sisask and Ardi Tampuu and Tambet Matiisen},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2608.30819},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30819v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2608.30819.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2608.30819)

Discussion